
2.3 — The Four Qualities of a Dayan: Wealth, Truth, and Hatred of Gain
When Yisro outlines the qualifications for judges, he does not begin with brilliance or piety. He begins with character: [אַנְשֵׁי חַיִל… אַנְשֵׁי אֱמֶת… שֹׂנְאֵי בָצַע — “capable men… men of truth… haters of gain”]. The Torah is telling us something uncomfortable: religious sincerity alone does not safeguard justice.
This essay examines why Torah law distrusts bribability—even among the devout—and why judicial integrity begins with inner resistance to benefit.
The phrase [אַנְשֵׁי חַיִל — “capable men”] is often misunderstood as physical strength or social standing. In context, it means resilience: the ability to withstand pressure, fatigue, intimidation, and appeal.
Judging is not a neutral activity. It exposes a dayan to:
Torah therefore demands capacity—the strength to remain steady when the stakes rise.
Truth in Torah is not merely factual accuracy. [אַנְשֵׁי אֱמֶת — “men of truth”] describes a person whose relationship to reality is disciplined. Such a judge:
Truth must be a habit, not a heroic moment. A judge who tells the truth only when it is costly is already compromised.
The most arresting requirement is [שֹׂנְאֵי בָצַע — “haters of gain”]. Torah does not say “those who avoid bribes,” but those who hate profit. Why the extremity?
Because bribery rarely announces itself. It enters quietly—as gratitude, obligation, reputation, or future advantage. A judge who merely avoids overt corruption may still be influenced. Torah therefore demands an inner aversion to benefit itself.
Justice cannot survive where advantage is attractive.
The Torah’s distrust is principled, not cynical. Piety does not cancel bias. On the contrary, religious confidence can mask self-justification: “I know my intentions are pure.”
By insisting on hatred of gain, the Torah guards against:
The dayan must not only refuse bribes; he must recoil from them.
Chazal note that judges were ideally financially independent. Wealth here is not luxury; it is insulation. Dependence—on donors, patrons, or reputation—creates leverage. Torah justice requires freedom from leverage.
This is why judicial integrity is an institutional value, not merely a personal one.
These qualities are not aspirational; they are architectural. A court staffed by capable, truthful, and gain-averse judges creates:
Without them, even perfect statutes collapse in practice.
Chassidic masters teach that desire bends perception. Where gain is loved, clarity dims. Hatred of gain is not asceticism; it is optical correction—keeping the lens clean so truth remains visible.
Modern societies often assume that good rules can compensate for weak character. Parshas Yisro disagrees. Torah insists that justice rests on who judges, not only how they judge.
The question is not whether a judge knows the law, but whether the law can speak through him without interference.
📖 Sources


2.3 — The Four Qualities of a Dayan: Wealth, Truth, and Hatred of Gain
When Yisro outlines the qualifications for judges, he does not begin with brilliance or piety. He begins with character: [אַנְשֵׁי חַיִל… אַנְשֵׁי אֱמֶת… שֹׂנְאֵי בָצַע — “capable men… men of truth… haters of gain”]. The Torah is telling us something uncomfortable: religious sincerity alone does not safeguard justice.
This essay examines why Torah law distrusts bribability—even among the devout—and why judicial integrity begins with inner resistance to benefit.
The phrase [אַנְשֵׁי חַיִל — “capable men”] is often misunderstood as physical strength or social standing. In context, it means resilience: the ability to withstand pressure, fatigue, intimidation, and appeal.
Judging is not a neutral activity. It exposes a dayan to:
Torah therefore demands capacity—the strength to remain steady when the stakes rise.
Truth in Torah is not merely factual accuracy. [אַנְשֵׁי אֱמֶת — “men of truth”] describes a person whose relationship to reality is disciplined. Such a judge:
Truth must be a habit, not a heroic moment. A judge who tells the truth only when it is costly is already compromised.
The most arresting requirement is [שֹׂנְאֵי בָצַע — “haters of gain”]. Torah does not say “those who avoid bribes,” but those who hate profit. Why the extremity?
Because bribery rarely announces itself. It enters quietly—as gratitude, obligation, reputation, or future advantage. A judge who merely avoids overt corruption may still be influenced. Torah therefore demands an inner aversion to benefit itself.
Justice cannot survive where advantage is attractive.
The Torah’s distrust is principled, not cynical. Piety does not cancel bias. On the contrary, religious confidence can mask self-justification: “I know my intentions are pure.”
By insisting on hatred of gain, the Torah guards against:
The dayan must not only refuse bribes; he must recoil from them.
Chazal note that judges were ideally financially independent. Wealth here is not luxury; it is insulation. Dependence—on donors, patrons, or reputation—creates leverage. Torah justice requires freedom from leverage.
This is why judicial integrity is an institutional value, not merely a personal one.
These qualities are not aspirational; they are architectural. A court staffed by capable, truthful, and gain-averse judges creates:
Without them, even perfect statutes collapse in practice.
Chassidic masters teach that desire bends perception. Where gain is loved, clarity dims. Hatred of gain is not asceticism; it is optical correction—keeping the lens clean so truth remains visible.
Modern societies often assume that good rules can compensate for weak character. Parshas Yisro disagrees. Torah insists that justice rests on who judges, not only how they judge.
The question is not whether a judge knows the law, but whether the law can speak through him without interference.
📖 Sources




“The Four Qualities of a Dayan: Wealth, Truth, and Hatred of Gain”
שֹׁפְטִים וְשֹׁטְרִים תִּתֵּן לְךָ
The Torah’s command to appoint judges presumes standards of character. Yisro’s criteria define the type of individuals fit to carry judicial authority.
בְּצֶדֶק תִּשְׁפֹּט עֲמִיתֶךָ
Righteous judgment requires inner alignment with truth. A judge devoted to emet resists convenience and favoritism.
וְשֹׁחַד לֹא תִקָּח
The Torah forbids bribery because it blinds perception. Yisro’s demand that judges hate gain addresses the root, not only the symptom, of corruption.
מֹאזְנֵי צֶדֶק
Just as commerce requires accurate measures, justice requires moral precision. Hatred of gain preserves fairness in both realms.


“The Four Qualities of a Dayan: Wealth, Truth, and Hatred of Gain”
Parshas Yisro establishes that justice depends on character before procedure. Yisro’s qualifications for judges reveal the Torah’s insistence that law be administered by individuals insulated from pressure and benefit. This ethical groundwork prepares the nation to receive Divine law at Sinai with structures capable of sustaining it.

Dive into mitzvos, tefillah, and Torah study—each section curated to help you learn, reflect, and live with intention. New insights are added regularly, creating an evolving space for spiritual growth.

Explore the 613 mitzvos and uncover the meaning behind each one. Discover practical ways to integrate them into your daily life with insights, sources, and guided reflection.

Learn the structure, depth, and spiritual intent behind Jewish prayer. Dive into morning blessings, Shema, Amidah, and more—with tools to enrich your daily connection.

Each week’s parsha offers timeless wisdom and modern relevance. Explore summaries, key themes, and mitzvah connections to deepen your understanding of the Torah cycle.