
“אֶהְיֶה אֲשֶׁר אֶהְיֶה” — A Name of Presence, Not Timetables
Standing before the Burning Bush, Moshe does not ask how redemption will happen.
He asks what to say.
When the people demand legitimacy, Moshe anticipates their question:
“וְאָמְרוּ־לִי מַה־שְּׁמוֹ מָה אֹמַר אֲלֵהֶם”
[“They will say to me: ‘What is His Name?’ What shall I say to them?”] (Shemos 3:13)
Moshe is not asking for information.
He is asking for assurance.
Names in Torah are not labels. They describe how Hashem will be experienced in history. Moshe seeks a Name that can carry a people through suffering without breaking them under expectation.
Hashem’s answer is unexpected — and deliberately incomplete.
Hashem responds:
“וַיֹּאמֶר אֱלֹקִים אֶל־מֹשֶׁה אֶהְיֶה אֲשֶׁר אֶהְיֶה”
[“And G-d said to Moshe: ‘I will be what I will be.’”]
This is not a definition.
It is a refusal to be defined by timelines.
Rashi explains that “Ehyeh” means I am with them in this suffering, and I will be with them in future sufferings. But Hashem immediately limits what Moshe may relay:
Tell them only “אֶהְיֶה שְׁלָחַנִי אֲלֵיכֶם” —
“Ehyeh has sent me to you.”
Hashem withholds mention of future pain, not because it will not come, but because a people crushed by exile cannot bear forecasts of suffering.
The Name offered is not predictive.
It is accompaniment.
This moment completes the theology of the Burning Bush.
“Ehyeh” means: I will be with you — but I will not give you a calendar.
The Torah refuses to equate faith with foresight.
Chassidus and Rav Kook both warn that obsession with timelines deforms faith.
When redemption is reduced to prediction:
“Ehyeh” protects Israel from this distortion.
Hashem does not say when He will redeem —
He says how He will relate.
Redemption is not measured by speed.
It is measured by presence sustained.
Unlike static names, “Ehyeh” unfolds.
It is a Name that adapts to circumstance without changing essence:
Rav Kook teaches that this Name reflects a living relationship — Hashem reveals Himself as the people can receive Him, without abandoning them to abstraction or overwhelming them with certainty.
Presence remains.
Form evolves.
The Torah here sets a demanding standard for faith.
Faith is not trust that things will improve quickly.
Faith is trust that one is not alone, even when improvement delays.
“Ehyeh” sanctifies waiting.
It insists that accompaniment is enough to endure uncertainty.
Every generation asks Moshe’s question anew:
The Name given at the Burning Bush answers gently — and firmly.
You may ask for presence.
You may not demand a timetable.
Redemption lives where presence is recognized without guarantees.
The Burning Bush does not burn out.
Moshe does not rush ahead.
And Hashem does not offer dates.
Instead, He offers a Name that can survive history:
אֶהְיֶה — I will be with you.
The Torah teaches that this is not less than certainty.
It is deeper.
When presence is enough, redemption has already begun.
📖 Sources


“אֶהְיֶה אֲשֶׁר אֶהְיֶה” — A Name of Presence, Not Timetables
Standing before the Burning Bush, Moshe does not ask how redemption will happen.
He asks what to say.
When the people demand legitimacy, Moshe anticipates their question:
“וְאָמְרוּ־לִי מַה־שְּׁמוֹ מָה אֹמַר אֲלֵהֶם”
[“They will say to me: ‘What is His Name?’ What shall I say to them?”] (Shemos 3:13)
Moshe is not asking for information.
He is asking for assurance.
Names in Torah are not labels. They describe how Hashem will be experienced in history. Moshe seeks a Name that can carry a people through suffering without breaking them under expectation.
Hashem’s answer is unexpected — and deliberately incomplete.
Hashem responds:
“וַיֹּאמֶר אֱלֹקִים אֶל־מֹשֶׁה אֶהְיֶה אֲשֶׁר אֶהְיֶה”
[“And G-d said to Moshe: ‘I will be what I will be.’”]
This is not a definition.
It is a refusal to be defined by timelines.
Rashi explains that “Ehyeh” means I am with them in this suffering, and I will be with them in future sufferings. But Hashem immediately limits what Moshe may relay:
Tell them only “אֶהְיֶה שְׁלָחַנִי אֲלֵיכֶם” —
“Ehyeh has sent me to you.”
Hashem withholds mention of future pain, not because it will not come, but because a people crushed by exile cannot bear forecasts of suffering.
The Name offered is not predictive.
It is accompaniment.
This moment completes the theology of the Burning Bush.
“Ehyeh” means: I will be with you — but I will not give you a calendar.
The Torah refuses to equate faith with foresight.
Chassidus and Rav Kook both warn that obsession with timelines deforms faith.
When redemption is reduced to prediction:
“Ehyeh” protects Israel from this distortion.
Hashem does not say when He will redeem —
He says how He will relate.
Redemption is not measured by speed.
It is measured by presence sustained.
Unlike static names, “Ehyeh” unfolds.
It is a Name that adapts to circumstance without changing essence:
Rav Kook teaches that this Name reflects a living relationship — Hashem reveals Himself as the people can receive Him, without abandoning them to abstraction or overwhelming them with certainty.
Presence remains.
Form evolves.
The Torah here sets a demanding standard for faith.
Faith is not trust that things will improve quickly.
Faith is trust that one is not alone, even when improvement delays.
“Ehyeh” sanctifies waiting.
It insists that accompaniment is enough to endure uncertainty.
Every generation asks Moshe’s question anew:
The Name given at the Burning Bush answers gently — and firmly.
You may ask for presence.
You may not demand a timetable.
Redemption lives where presence is recognized without guarantees.
The Burning Bush does not burn out.
Moshe does not rush ahead.
And Hashem does not offer dates.
Instead, He offers a Name that can survive history:
אֶהְיֶה — I will be with you.
The Torah teaches that this is not less than certainty.
It is deeper.
When presence is enough, redemption has already begun.
📖 Sources




“The Burning Bush — Presence, Attention, and the Shape of Redemption — Part III
‘אֶהְיֶה אֲשֶׁר אֶהְיֶה’ — A Name of Presence, Not Timetables”
אָנֹכִי ה׳ אֱלֹקֶיךָ
At the Burning Bush, knowledge of Hashem is revealed not as abstract certainty, but as relational presence. “אֶהְיֶה אֲשֶׁר אֶהְיֶה” teaches that to know Hashem is to recognize His accompaniment through history, even when outcomes remain hidden. Parshas Shemos reframes this mitzvah as awareness grounded in trust rather than prediction. True knowledge of Hashem does not demand timelines; it rests in the assurance that Divine presence abides through suffering and delay alike.
אֶת־ה׳ אֱלֹקֶיךָ תִּירָא
Rashi’s explanation of “Ehyeh” underscores a reverence rooted in restraint. Yirah here is not fear of punishment, but humility before a G-d who refuses to be reduced to human scheduling. Parshas Shemos teaches that fear of Heaven includes accepting the limits of human knowing. By withholding future timetables, Hashem cultivates reverence that honors mystery, patience, and trust in Divine wisdom rather than control.
וְהָלַכְתָּ בִדְרָכָיו
Hashem’s self-revelation as “Ehyeh” models presence without overexposure and guidance without guarantees. Emulating His ways therefore means learning to accompany others faithfully without promising outcomes one cannot deliver. Parshas Shemos teaches that walking in Hashem’s ways includes offering presence instead of predictions, support instead of certainty. Redemption unfolds through sustained relationship, mirroring the Divine mode of accompaniment revealed at the Burning Bush.


“The Burning Bush — Presence, Attention, and the Shape of Redemption — Part III
‘אֶהְיֶה אֲשֶׁר אֶהְיֶה’ — A Name of Presence, Not Timetables”
In Parshas Shemos, Moshe asks what Name he should convey to a suffering people seeking assurance. Hashem responds with “אֶהְיֶה אֲשֶׁר אֶהְיֶה,” a Name that affirms Divine accompaniment rather than predictive certainty. Rashi explains that this Name signifies Hashem’s presence with Israel in their current suffering and beyond, yet Moshe is instructed to share only “אֶהְיֶה שְׁלָחַנִי,” sparing the people foreknowledge of future afflictions. The Torah thus teaches that redemption is not anchored in timelines or guarantees, but in sustained presence. By withholding calendars while affirming accompaniment, Shemos establishes a model of faith grounded in trust rather than foresight, and a theology in which Divine nearness endures even when outcomes remain concealed.

Dive into mitzvos, tefillah, and Torah study—each section curated to help you learn, reflect, and live with intention. New insights are added regularly, creating an evolving space for spiritual growth.

Explore the 613 mitzvos and uncover the meaning behind each one. Discover practical ways to integrate them into your daily life with insights, sources, and guided reflection.

Learn the structure, depth, and spiritual intent behind Jewish prayer. Dive into morning blessings, Shema, Amidah, and more—with tools to enrich your daily connection.

Each week’s parsha offers timeless wisdom and modern relevance. Explore summaries, key themes, and mitzvah connections to deepen your understanding of the Torah cycle.