In this week’s parsha, Toldot, Yitzchak and Rivkah become parents to twin sons—Yaakov and Eisav—whose contrasting natures foreshadow the unfolding of two nations. Amid famine, Yitzchak settles in the land of the Philistines, where his success and the digging of wells provoke local envy. Later, guided by Rivkah’s prophetic insight, Yaakov disguises himself as Eisav to receive the blessings intended for his brother, ensuring that G-d’s covenantal promise continues through him and setting the stage for enduring family and spiritual conflict.
#22 — To learn Torah and teach it — Deuteronomy 6:7
In Toldot: Yaakov is described as an “ish tam yoshev ohalim,” dwelling in tents of Torah—modeling a life centered on learning.
Narrative roots: Genesis 25:27.
#77 — To serve the Almighty with prayer daily — Exodus 23:25
In Toldot: “Vaye‘etar Yitzchak…” Yitzchak prays intensely on behalf of Rivkah; she, too, seeks out Hashem. Prayer stands at the heart of the family’s story.
Narrative roots: Genesis 25:21–22.
#499 — Buy and sell according to Torah law — Leviticus 25:14
In Toldot: The sale of the bechorah (birthright) between Yaakov and Esav highlights the gravity of transactions, oaths, and intent in Torah commerce.
Narrative roots: Genesis 25:29–34.
#214 — To fulfill what was uttered and to do what was avowed — Deuteronomy 23:24
In Toldot: Yitzchak and Avimelech formalize a covenant with oaths; keeping one’s word ensures peace and integrity.
Narrative roots: Genesis 26:26–31.
#209 — Not to swear falsely in G-d’s Name — Leviticus 19:12
In Toldot: The Avimelech treaty underscores that oaths invoking the Divine must be truthful and upheld.
Narrative roots: Genesis 26:28–31.
#162 — Not to marry non-Jews — Deuteronomy 7:3
In Toldot: Rivkah’s pain over Esav’s Hittite marriages and Yitzchak’s charge that Yaakov not take a Canaanite wife reflect the Torah’s boundary of covenantal marriage.
Narrative roots: Genesis 26:34–35; 27:46; 28:1.
#122 — To marry a wife by the means prescribed in the Torah (kiddushin) — Deuteronomy 24:1
In Toldot: Yitzchak sends Yaakov to marry within the family of Avraham—toward a sanctified, covenantal union.
Narrative roots: Genesis 28:1–5.
#584 — Respect your father and mother — Exodus 20:12
In Toldot: “Yaakov listened to his father and mother and went to Paddan Aram,” exemplifying kibbud av va’em.
Narrative roots: Genesis 28:7.
#125 — To have children with one’s wife — Genesis 1:28
In Toldot: The parsha centers on the birth of Yaakov and Esav and the transmission of covenant to the next generation.
Narrative roots: Genesis 25:24–26.
#501 — Not to insult or harm anybody with words — Leviticus 25:17
In Toldot: The narrative contrasts Esav’s contempt for the birthright with the careful, respectful speech expected in a holy home—warning against verbal harm and disdain.
Narrative roots: Genesis 25:34; 27:46.
Rashi opens Toldos by affirming that Isaac’s likeness to Avraham was divinely arranged, silencing those who doubted Sarah’s purity (25:19). Rivkah’s lineage—“daughter of Betuel, sister of Lavan”—is repeated to emphasize her righteousness amid corruption.
Prayer and birth reveal spiritual dynamics: both parents pray, yet G-d answers Isaac, the tzaddik ben tzaddik (25:21). The twins’ struggle in the womb foretells an enduring tension—Yaakov drawn to Torah, Esav to idolatry—and that one nation’s rise mirrors the other’s fall (25:22–23).
At birth, Esav’s redness signals violence; Yaakov’s hand on the heel foreshadows destiny (25:25–26). Their youth contrasts sharply:
The lentil stew marks Avraham’s passing; Yaakov purchases the birthright, knowing the service belongs to the righteous firstborn (25:29–34).
Later, Isaac’s blindness comes either from idolatrous smoke, angelic tears, or Divine design enabling Yaakov’s blessing (27:1). Yaakov’s gentleness contrasts Esav’s roughness—“the voice is Jacob’s voice”—and the fragrance of Gan Eden fills the room (27:22–27).
Isaac’s blessing invokes “HaElokim”—G-d’s attribute of justice, granting bounty only if deserved, while Esav’s material plenty is unconditional (27:28–29, 39). Isaac later confirms, “גם ברוך יהיה,” acknowledging Heaven’s will (27:33).
Rashi closes with Rivkah’s prophetic foresight—sending Yaakov to Beit Eiver, where he studies fourteen years, safeguarded by Torah merit before journeying to Haran (28:3–9).
Key Themes: Divine Providence, moral contrast, covenantal inheritance, and Torah as protection.
📖 Source
For Ramban, Toldot is not simply a family chronicle but a deliberate shaping of covenantal identity, prophetic history, and the moral psychology of its characters. The opening “Avraham begot Yitzchak” resets lineage to emphasize that only Isaac carries Avraham’s covenant, excluding the lines of Yishmael and Keturah. Rivkah’s anguished “lamah zeh anochi” reflects existential despair, prompting prayer (“lidrosh Hashem”), which yields a dual message: natural reassurance—her pain stems from twins—and prophetic revelation about the future conflict between Israel and Edom. Ramban’s reading of Yitzchak’s love for Esav rejects material dependence; “tzayid befiv” signals that Esav’s persona—his mastery, cunning, and self-presentation—shaped Isaac’s perception. The sale of the birthright becomes a moral and theological watershed: Esav’s disdain reflects fatalism and appetite rather than poverty, and Jacob’s insistence on an oath ensures legal and spiritual finality.
Ramban reads the chapter’s geographical and symbolic elements—famine, exile in Gerar, and Isaac’s wells—as prophetic allegory. The three wells (Esek, Sitnah, Rechovot) map onto the First Temple, Second Temple, and the Future Temple, charting a trajectory from contention and destruction to ultimate expansion and peace. Rivkah’s orchestration of the blessings is presented as an act of covenantal necessity: Isaac intended to give Esav the “blessing of Avraham,” and Rivkah intervenes to ensure Jacob receives it with Isaac’s full, prophetic consent, as reflected in his trembling recognition (“גם ברוך יהיה”). The blessings themselves reveal divergent destinies—Jacob is granted perpetual Divine abundance tied to the Land, while Esav receives non-covenantal prosperity, military resilience, and conditional freedom when Israel falters. Jacob’s flight and Esav’s murderous resolve underscore the moral stakes of the narrative, highlighting Rivkah’s prophetic insight and Esav’s inability to align with covenantal values.
📖 Source
Maimonides reads Parashat Toldot as a study in how divine providence operates through intellect, moral discipline, and natural order. In his rational theology, blessing does not descend arbitrarily; it flows through those who have refined both mind and conduct to align with G-d’s wisdom. Toldot becomes a moral allegory of how human perfection invites providence and how ethical reason sustains the covenant through generations.
When G-d instructs Isaac, “Do not go down to Egypt; dwell in the land that I will tell you” (26:2), the Rambam reads this as the model of providence functioning within nature. G-d’s will is not an interruption of causality but its highest guidance. Isaac’s obedience to remain in the land represents alignment with divine order—acting through reasoned trust rather than impulsive self-preservation.
In Moreh Nevukhim (III:17–18), Rambam explains that providence extends in proportion to intellectual perfection: the more one perceives the divine wisdom within creation, the more one lives in harmony with its laws. Thus, Isaac’s prosperity—sowing in famine and reaping a hundredfold—is not supernatural indulgence but cause meeting worthiness, the predictable outcome of intellect-guided virtue under G-d’s governance.
The conflict over wells (26:18–22) dramatizes how ethical society evolves. For Rambam, civic friction, diplomacy, and treaty-making are expressions of moral intelligence applied to communal life. Isaac’s restraint—moving from Esek (contention) to Sitnah (enmity) and finally Rechovot (spaciousness)—symbolizes the progress from conflict to peace through justice and foresight.
In Hilchot Deʿot 1, Rambam defines virtue as the “middle way”—temperance between excess and deficiency. Isaac’s conduct embodies this ideal: neither passive nor aggressive, he cultivates a moral equilibrium that earns him both wealth and respect. The wells, once his father’s, now represent renewed ethical infrastructure—law, sustenance, and social order—re-dug in each generation.
Esav’s exchange of his birthright for lentil stew (25:29–34) becomes for Rambam the parable of intellect’s rule over appetite. Esav, the archetype of unchecked desire, trades the enduring good for immediate pleasure—an image of how the imagination enslaved to bodily impulse forfeits higher perfection.
Yaakov, the ish tam yoshev ohalim, models the life of reasoned devotion—study, restraint, and foresight. The birthright signifies responsibility, not privilege; it belongs to the one capable of sustaining divine service through intellect and discipline. In Hilchot Avodah Zarah 1:3, Rambam describes how idolatry began with imaginative error—the substitution of symbolic gesture for truth. Similarly, Esav’s impulsiveness mirrors the moral blindness of those who let sense dominate intellect.
Isaac’s blessing scene (27:1–29) is read as an instance of prophetic disposition, not mere paternal sentiment. The act of eating “delicacies” before blessing reflects Rambam’s theory in Moreh Nevukhim II:36—that the prophet attains heightened intellectual and emotional harmony, freeing the mind from distraction to receive divine influence. Isaac’s blindness represents physical limitation offset by spiritual clarity; in his purified state, his words channel divine overflow.
The blessing itself follows the Maimonidean principle that providence corresponds to one’s internal readiness. Yaakov receives both the “dew of heaven” (spiritual wisdom) and the “fat of the earth” (ethical prosperity), a harmony of spirit and matter. Esav’s secondary blessing—strength without moral compass—illustrates power divorced from intellect, a lesser form of providence limited to temporal success.
For Rambam, Isaac’s life exemplifies the ideal balance between contemplative knowledge and ethical action. The covenant continues not through miracles but through the rational application of divine law within human society. Faith is not belief detached from reason but reason disciplined by revelation.
In Hilchot Yesodei HaTorah 2 and 7, Rambam teaches that knowledge of G-d begins with study of creation and culminates in awe and love. Isaac embodies this: his meditation in the fields (lasuach basadeh) and his measured dealings with Abimelech represent a life where intellect, emotion, and deed converge in reverent order.
Toldot thus portrays the threefold hierarchy of perfection:
Providence flows through these levels, not as favoritism but as cause and effect in a divinely ordered world. Isaac’s stability amid conflict, Yaakov’s disciplined pursuit of blessing, and the ethical restraint that defines their lineage all model the Rambam’s conviction:
“G-d’s care cleaves to those who know Him and act according to that knowledge.” (Moreh Nevukhim III:51)
Through Toldot, the Rambam reveals a Judaism that unites mind and action, law and virtue—a covenant sustained not by miracle but by wisdom made deed.
📖 Sources
For the Ralbag, Toldot shows how Providence tracks human readiness. G-d’s care increases with one’s intellectual and moral perfection and can even extend to descendants through the merit of the perfected parent (e.g., Isaac blessed “for Avraham’s sake”).
Ralbag treats success as the orderly result of preparation plus Providence—not magic. Isaac’s hundredfold yield in a famine year is publicized to display G-d’s affection for those cleaving to Him, yet Isaac still sows, measures, and manages conflict over wells.
How prophetic blessing works (key Ralbag move): a berakhah is part revelation, part prayer, always scaled to the recipient’s preparedness (and, secondarily, their “system”—mazal). Isaac asks for delicacies not for indulgence, but to focus his mind on the recipient so prophecy can determine the fitting blessing.
In sum: Ralbag’s Toldot is a philosophy of earned Providence—intellect shapes virtue; virtue draws help from Heaven; blessings confirm and amplify what character has made likely.
📖 Sources
Toldot — The Hidden Work of Refinement
Toldot centers on tension within the same household—between concealment and revelation, effort and grace. Chassidic masters read the struggle of Yaakov and Esav not only as a historical divide but as a spiritual dialectic within every person: the contest between the holy impulse and the material drive, between the voice of Yaakov and the hands of Esav.
The Baal Shem Tov interprets “two nations in your womb” as the dual forces within the soul—each moment demanding choice. Through avodah b’emet, sincere service of G-d, the inner Yaakov must elevate the energy of Esav—the power of passion and vitality—toward holiness. The aim is not destruction of the physical but its refinement.
The Kedushat Levi teaches that Isaac’s wells represent spiritual depth hidden beneath obstruction. The act of re-digging symbolizes the tzaddik’s mission to reopen blocked channels of divine awareness in the heart. Every conflict (Esek, Sitnah) is a stage of inner resistance, until one reaches Rechovot—expansiveness—where divine flow becomes steady and unopposed.
The Sfas Emes (Toldos 5631) explains that Jacob’s “voice” embodies the power of prayer to restore alignment when external appearances deceive. The blessing scene is a parable for inward truth cloaked in worldly garments—faith (emunah) speaking through action, even amid disguise.
In Toldot, the Chassidic vision turns struggle into service: opposition births depth, concealment invites sincerity, and blessing flows when one uncovers holiness within the everyday.
📖 Sources
Rabbi Sacks reads Toldot as a meditation on identity formed through moral choice. The parsha, he writes, is not merely about the rivalry between two brothers but about “what it means to inherit the covenant of G-d and live it in history.”
Isaac’s life embodies continuity through restraint. Unlike Avraham’s dramatic journeys or Yaakov’s trials, Yitzchak’s role is to hold steady—to preserve and deepen what already exists. Rabbi Sacks notes that “spiritual greatness sometimes lies not in change but in faithfulness.”
The struggle between Yaakov and Esav becomes, in Sacks’s view, a study in values versus impulses. Esav lives in the immediacy of appetite—“the man of the field”—while Yaakov, the “tent-dweller,” builds a life of covenant and responsibility. The birthright, then, is not seized but earned through discipline and vision.
Rivkah’s insight and Yaakov’s moral tension show that G-d’s covenant passes not through perfection but through the wrestling of conscience. For Rabbi Sacks, Toldot reminds us that spiritual inheritance is never automatic—it must be reaffirmed by each generation’s courage to choose faith over comfort.
“The challenge of Toldot is not who we are, but who we become.”
— Covenant & Conversation, Toldot 5775
📖 Source
Rav Kook views Toldot as a portrait of spiritual balance — between holiness and worldliness, restraint and transformation, revelation and refinement. Each episode in the parsha expresses a stage in how Divine light becomes manifest in the material world through human action and moral development.
1. Abraham and the Sanctity of Deed
In “Abraham Kept Mitzvot”, Rav Kook rejects the notion that the patriarchs’ observance of mitzvot was only symbolic or intellectual. Abraham’s greatness, he explains, lay not in abstract belief but in his fusion of faith with practice. Mitzvot sanctify matter and train the human being to distinguish not only between sacred and profane, but also between degrees of holiness (bein kodesh le-kodesh). Judaism’s genius is its insistence that the highest truths are preserved through physical deeds, redeeming the material world rather than escaping it.
2. Harnessing the Power of Esau
In “Harnessing the Power of Esau”, Rav Kook interprets the twins as two necessary spiritual forces. Esau represents raw vitality and passion — the drive and physical energy indispensable to civilization. Jacob embodies restraint and spiritual order, initially “holding the heel” to limit Esau’s destructiveness. But the higher goal, symbolized by Jacob’s later name Israel, is not suppression but transformation: channeling Esau’s strength toward ethical and creative ends. The mature Jacob — Israel — unites holiness and vigor, teaching that sanctity must engage power, not flee from it.
3. Jacob’s Hand on Esau’s Heel
In “Jacob’s Hand on Esau’s Heel”, Rav Kook deepens this theme through the doctrine of segulah, divine selection unfolding through hidden processes. Isaac’s love for Esau reflects faith in the latent potential within even coarse forces — the conviction that redemption arises when the righteous elevate the unruly elements of creation. Jacob, by “grasping the heel,” signifies the intellect and will guiding instinct. His disguise before Isaac dramatizes this spiritual truth: Israel must sometimes “wear Esau’s garments” — engage the outer world with strength and sovereignty — while keeping its inner essence pure and governed by moral vision.
4. Jacob Rescued Abraham
In “Jacob Rescued Abraham”, Rav Kook reads the Midrash of Jacob saving Abraham from Nimrod’s furnace as an allegory of two paths to holiness. Abraham embodies the path of fiery revolution — sudden leaps of faith and self-sacrifice. Jacob represents the path of steady, disciplined ascent through Torah and daily effort. The latter “rescues” the former by ensuring that Abraham’s passion matures into enduring practice. Redemption, Rav Kook teaches, ultimately depends on Jacob’s model — growth without shame (“Jacob will not be ashamed”), the sanctification of time through gradual human striving.
Together, these teachings weave a coherent philosophy: holiness must inhabit the physical; passion must be refined by intellect; and redemption advances not through destruction but through the patient elevation of the world itself.
📖 Sources
The parsha of Toldot speaks across generations because it reveals how holiness unfolds within tension — between brothers, between ideals and instincts, between the call of covenant and the pull of comfort. Its message for modern life is both timeless and urgent: to live as heirs of Avraham means to refine rather than escape the material world, and to transform struggle into spiritual progress.
1. Covenant as Daily Practice
From Rashi’s stress on Isaac’s likeness to Avraham and Rav Kook’s teaching that “deed anchors faith,” we learn that belief alone cannot sustain a covenantal life. Judaism’s genius lies in its fusion of faith and discipline — prayer, mitzvot, honesty, and diligence — through which holiness enters ordinary routines. In a world obsessed with ideals but short on action, Toldot reminds us that truth becomes real only through consistency.
2. Refining the “Esav Within”
Ralbag and the Chassidic masters teach that Esav’s strength, though dangerous, holds latent good if guided by intellect and humility. Every person contains both the “voice of Yaakov” and the “hands of Esav.” The task is not to repress vitality but to direct it toward creation, compassion, and purpose. Leadership, business, or art—each becomes sacred when channeled toward ethical ends.
3. Gradual Growth Over Drastic Change
Rambam and Rav Kook converge on a principle of measured ascent. True change is rarely instant; it matures through steady refinement of intellect and character. Like Jacob, one builds holiness through deliberate study, honest labor, and moral choice. In an age of shortcuts and spectacle, Toldot calls for Jacob’s path of quiet perseverance — to redeem the world not in flashes of fire, but in years of faithful work.
4. Providence Through Preparation
Ramban and Ralbag reveal that divine blessing rests not on favoritism but on readiness. Providence attaches to those who cultivate virtue, peace, and order. “Also blessed shall he be” (27:33) becomes a model for trust in G-d’s justice: when we align our actions with Torah’s wisdom, outcomes—though not always immediate—find divine harmony.
5. The Eternal Struggle and Its Hope
Rabbi Sacks sees Toldot as the drama of identity — of who we become through moral choice. In a polarized world, Isaac’s quiet endurance and Rivkah’s courageous insight teach that faithfulness and conscience together sustain the covenant. The Jewish story continues because each generation chooses covenant anew, not through perfection but through persistence.
In daily life, Toldot calls us to hold both strength and gentleness, faith and reason, patience and passion — to live as Jacob did, with hands that work the world and a voice that still speaks of Heaven.
📖 Sources
“ואלה תולדות יצחק”—Rashi reads the toledot as Yaakov and Esav themselves, the drama that follows (25:19). On “אברהם הוליד את יצחק” he counters the scoffers who claimed Sarah conceived from Avimelech: G-d fashioned Isaac’s visage to match Abraham’s, forcing public acknowledgment of paternity (25:19).
Rivkah is repeatedly labeled “בת בתואל… אחות לבן… מפדן ארם” to praise her virtue: daughter, sister, and townsfolk were wicked, yet she learned none of their ways (25:20). “פדן” hints to a pair (two Arams), or field of Aram in Arabic usage (25:20).
“ויעתר יצחק”—he multiplied supplication; husband and wife prayed in opposite corners (25:21). Yet G-d was entreated of him—the prayer of a tzaddik son of a tzaddik bears unique force (25:21).
“ויתרוצצו הבנים”—a verse that “demands derash”: Yaakov strains for batei midrash, Esav for idol temples; or they contend over two worlds (25:22). Through Shem’s prophecy, she is told “שני גוים/גאים”—anticipating noble figures (Antoninus and Rabbi), and alternating ascendancy: when one rises the other falls (25:23). The word “תֹּמם” (defective) signals one righteous, one wicked (25:24).
Esav’s redness portends bloodshed; his full hair marks him “made” (‘asu’i)—hence Esav (25:25). Yaakov grips the heel—an omen that Esav’s rule will be brief before Yaakov supplants him; G-d Himself names “יעקב” (25:26). Rashi reconstructs the ages: Isaac waits in holiness; marriage at 40, infertility persists until prayer (25:20, 26).
At thirteen their paths diverge: Esav becomes “יודע ציד”—a hunter with the mouth, deceiving through faux-halachic punctiliousness; איש שדה without settled craft. Yaakov is תם, his mouth as his heart, יושב אהלים—Shem and Eiver (25:27–28).
“ויזד יעקב נזיד”—lentils for Abraham’s shivah (his death advanced five years so as not to witness Esav’s decline); the round legume symbolizes the wheel of mourning and the mourner’s reticence (25:29–30). Sale “כיום”—a certain, clear transaction; Yaakov seeks the birthright because the avodah belongs to the bechor, and the wicked is unfit to serve (25:31). Esav’s “הנה אנכי הולך למות” treats the service as danger; Scripture testifies: “ויבז עשו את הבכורה.” (25:32–34)
G-d bars Isaac: “אל תרד מצרימה”—you are an “עולה תמימה”; chutz la’aretz is unbefitting (26:2). The Avrahamic promises are renewed; “והתברכו בזרעך” = a formula of blessing invoked by others (26:3–5).
In Gerar, the ruse of “אחותי” recurs until Avimelech sees (26:7–10). Despite a hard land and famine year, Isaac reaps “מאה שערים”—either measured yield or for tithing (26:12). Philistine envy leads to Esek and Sitnah; at Rechovot strife ceases—“ופרינו בארץ” (26:20–22). A treaty follows; the well is named Shivah for the oath (26:23–33).
At forty Esav marries Chitti women, adding hypocrisy like the boar that shows its hoof; they are “מרת רוח” to Yitzchak and Rivkah (26:34–35).
“ותכהין עיניו”—from idolatrous smoke, or angelic tears at the Akeidah, or so Jacob would receive the blessings (27:1). Isaac, anxious near parental lifespans, requests proper shechitah—“שא נא” (27:2–3). Rivkah secures two kids—one for Pesach, one for delicacies; they are hers by ketubah (27:9). Esav’s coveted garments (won from Nimrod) are stored by Rivkah; Yaakov wears goat-skins (27:15).
Isaac senses dissonance: “הקול קול יעקב והידים ידי עשו”—Yaakov’s supplicatory diction vs. Esav’s brusque tone (27:21–22). The fragrance of Gan Eden enters; “כריח שדה… שדה תפוחים” (27:27).
“ויתן לך”—give and give again; yet Rashi notes the Name “האלקים”: measured by justice—if worthy, receive; Esav’s material “משמני הארץ” is grant regardless, hence Shlomo’s two prayers (27:28). The hierarchy is sealed: “בני אמך ישתחוו לך… ארריך/מברכיך”—order reflects the tzaddik’s path: suffering precedes solace (27:29).
As one goes out, one comes in (27:30). Isaac trembles—sees Gehinnom opened beneath Esav; tasting “מכל” confirms authenticity. Lest one say the blessing was theft, Isaac ratifies: “גם ברוך יהיה.” (27:33)
Esav receives earth’s fatness (Rashi: Graeca Magna) and “ועל חרבך תחיה”; “כאשר תריד”—when Israel falters and Esav has grievance, he casts off the yoke (27:39–40).
Esav plots; Rivkah learns by Ruach HaKodesh, sends Yaakov to Lavan (27:41–45). Isaac blesses again: “ואל ש-די יברך אותך… את ברכת אברהם” (28:3–4). Esav adds Machalat (Ishmael’s daughter, sister of Nebayot) “על נשיו”—wickedness upon wickedness by not divorcing the first (28:9). Rashi’s chronology: Ishmael dies before the wedding; from these data he infers Yaakov hid in Beit Eiver fourteen years en route to Haran—Torah-merit shields from penalty, so Yosef is separated from Yaakov measure-for-measure only twenty-two years (28:7–9).
📖 Source
“Abraham begot Isaac.”Ramban says the Torah “resets” the lineage to the founding father to signal that only Isaac is counted as Avraham’s covenantal offspring (not Yishmael/Keturah). It’s a literary move used elsewhere in Chronicles to honor a distinguished line.
Rivkah’s Cry (25:22).
Ramban rejects both Rashi’s reading and Ibn Ezra’s explanation. Rivkah’s words “lamah zeh anochi” mean a deep cry of despair:
“If this is my fate, why am I alive? Would that I had never existed.”
It echoes Iyov-like longing for nonexistence — “I should have been as though I had not been.”
“Lidrosh Hashem.”
Ramban notes that drishah toward G-d always means prayer, not an intellectual inquiry. Rivkah turns to Hashem in supplication, begging for understanding and relief.
Divine Answer (25:23).
“Two nations are in your womb” first reassures her:
your pain comes from carrying twins — a normal cause of struggle in pregnancy.
Ramban adds a second layer: since these twins will become two long-opposed nations, their prenatal struggle is a prophetic foreshadowing of the future conflict between Israel and Edom.
Yet the immediate message is one of comfort:
Do not fear — the turmoil will quiet now, and you will have relief.
Why Yitzchak loved Esav (25:28).
“Because there was venison in his mouth” is not literal food-delivery, Ramban says.
It is a metaphor: in Yitzchak’s mouth — in his speech, perception, and impression — Esav was “the hunter.” Just as people are nicknamed by their defining trait, Esav’s identity as a skilled hunter (“ish yode’a tzayid”) was constantly on his father’s lips.
Chazal express it as: “good meat for his mouth, good drink for his mouth” — meaning Esav presented himself in ways that pleased his father, shaping Isaac’s perception of him.
Ramban rejects the simplistic reading that Isaac needed E25:30-34sav’s food or relied on him materially.
The verse instead highlights how Esav’s persona, cunning skill, and outward mastery made a strong impression on Yitzchak.
Birthright & stew (25:30–34).
“Red, red stew” gave Esav the name Edom—a public mockery that he traded something exalted for a bowl of lentils.
“Sell me kayom your birthright” means “at this time / for that day”: a legally fixed, binding transfer whose effect would begin when the birthright was meant to apply. Ramban explores Onkelos’ linguistic reading (kayom dilhei) and rejects creative theories that the stew wasn’t the payment.
Esav’s answer—“What is the birthright to me?”—signals that he expected to die young, exposed to mortal danger as a hunter. Since the birthright offered no benefit while Isaac was alive, Esav saw no value in it. Jacob therefore demanded an oath that Esav would never later contest the sale.
Ramban emphatically rejects Ibn Ezra’s claim that Isaac was poor and that Esav despised the birthright because the family lacked wealth. Isaac was blessed, wealthy, and honored; the patriarchs were like kings. Esav’s contempt came from his brutal, impulsive nature—not poverty, and not lack of material inheritance.
“So Esav despised the birthright”: the Torah’s moral verdict. After eating and drinking, he simply rose and returned to the hunt—concerned only with immediate appetite, careless of tomorrow.
Famine, Gerar, and exile pattern (ch. 26).
Isaac’s detour to the Philistines mirrors Babylonian exile—displacement without subjugation, eventual royal favor, and return.
Wells as Temple history (26:20).
The Torah’s long focus on Isaac’s wells is symbolic prophecy, not mere narrative. A well of living waters represents the House of G-d (“a fountain of living waters”).
Esek (“contention”) alludes to the First Temple, against which nations contended and ultimately destroyed.
Sitnah (“enmity”), an even harsher name, corresponds to the Second Temple, explicitly linked to sitnah (“accusation”) in Ezra; its entire era was marked by hostility until its destruction and exile.
Rechovot (“spaciousness”) points to the Future Temple, built without conflict, with expanded borders and universal worship—“we shall be fruitful in the land,” when all nations turn to G-d with one consent.
Rivkah’s strategy & secrecy (27:4–15).
Isaac intended to bless Esav with the blessing of Avraham—inheritance of the Land and covenantal continuity—because he was the firstborn. Rivkah never told him the prophecy “rav yaʿavod tzaʿir” (“the elder shall serve the younger”). Ramban explains that she may have withheld it out of modesty, because prophecy to a prophet was unnecessary, or because Isaac’s love for Esav might have led him to leave the matter to Heaven rather than bless Jacob directly.
Rivkah understood that the blessing Isaac sought to give was “before Hashem”—with Ruach HaKodesh—and if Esav received it, it would remain his forever. Her plan ensured that Jacob would receive this blessing with Isaac’s full, willing heart.
Jacob feared being felt, not recognized by voice: Isaac might kiss him or touch his face, discovering that he was smooth. Ramban notes the difficulty—why was Jacob not afraid of vocal recognition? Possibly the brothers’ voices were similar, or Jacob intentionally altered his voice; Chazal say “the voice” refers to Jacob’s gentle language invoking Hashem, not the sound of the voice itself.
Finally, the Torah’s repeated emphasis—“Esav her elder son, Jacob her younger son”—highlights Rivkah’s moral courage. Parents normally honor the firstborn; Rivkah overturned that instinct to transfer honor and blessing to the righteous son and avert it from the wicked one.
Jacob’s Blessing (27:28–29).
Ramban explains that “of the dew of heaven and of the fat places of the earth” is not a generic natural dew (which falls everywhere), but a steady, uninterrupted, lifelong Divine gift—an ongoing abundance “for all your days upon your land.” Isaac adds “plenty of grain and wine,” expressing enduring prosperity from the choicest land, the beauty of all lands.
The order “cursed…blessed” reflects the righteous path: they begin with hardship and ultimately reach tranquility (Bereishis Rabbah), so curses precede blessings in Jacob’s case.
Esav’s Blessing (27:39–40).
Esav also receives fat places and dew, but without Divine language (“G-d give you”) and without permanence. Ramban says it is a conditional, temporal blessing—“as long as you dwell there,” implying an ultimately unstable destiny.
“Hinei” (“behold”) signals Isaac’s message: there is enough dew and fertile land in the world for both brothers, but sovereignty is Jacob’s. Esav receives sustenance, but not lordship.
“By your sword you shall live” does not mean living off plunder; rather, Ramban explains it as survival and military resilience—he will not fall by the sword, yet will remain subordinate: “You shall serve your brother.”
But: “When you break loose…” (27:40) means that if Israel sins, Esav’s descendants may shake off Jacob’s yoke. Ramban cites Chazal: this teaches Israel not to provoke Edom, and explains episodes such as David’s shortened reign due to excessive conflict with Edom.
Later reinforcement (28:3–4).
Isaac later blesses Jacob with “El Shaddai… the blessing of Avraham,” tying Jacob uniquely to the Land, fulfilling Avraham’s covenant—something not given to Esav.
Isaac’s trembling (27:33).
Isaac’s violent trembling was not mere shock or panic—it was the moment of prophetic realization. When he asked, “Who is it that hunted and brought to me… and I blessed him?” he understood through Ruach HaKodesh that the blessing had already taken effect on Jacob and could not be reversed. Hence his immediate declaration, “גם ברוך יהיה”—“yes, he shall indeed remain blessed.”
Ramban explains: Isaac grasped that only Jacob’s offspring could truly receive this blessing, and once conferred, it was irrevocable. His trembling reflected the recognition that Esav, his beloved son, had now lost that blessing forever.
Esav’s plot & Jacob’s flight (27:41–45; 28:5).
“Esav said in his heart” means he formed a firm, inward resolve—deliberated hatred turning into a decision to kill Jacob. Ramban notes that such inner decisions are often called “speech of the heart,” even when accompanied by words. Whether Esav verbalized it or not, his murderous intent became known (either through informants or Rivkah’s Ruach HaKodesh), prompting her warning: “He is comforting himself with the thought of killing you.”
His plan to wait “until the days of mourning for my father” shows he would not bring grief to Isaac in life—or feared a paternal curse—but Rivkah still acted quickly, worried Isaac might die suddenly or Esav might strike earlier. Jacob, already hiding in shame and fear, is summoned by his mother and sent away.
In 28:5 the Torah stresses that Lavan is the brother of both Jacob’s and Esav’s mother. Isaac sends only Jacob to marry there, because he knew the Abrahamic covenant and blessing would continue through Jacob alone. Esav, hearing his parents’ displeasure with Canaanite marriages, imitates their will only partially—adding a new wife from Ishmael—but never correcting his existing, incompatible wives, exposing that he follows his desires more than his parents’ values.
Core Takeaways:
📖 Source
In Sforno’s commentary on Toldot, the Torah resets the covenantal line with “Avraham begot Yitzchak,” establishing that only Isaac is counted as Avraham’s seed (25:19). Rivkah’s pedigree—“sister of Lavan the Aramean”—signals a moral contrast in her home; from her would also emerge Esav, akin in character to her brother (25:20). Though promised progeny, Yitzchak prays specifically for worthy seed from Rivkah (25:21). Rivkah’s distress over the twins is not curiosity but mortal fear; the oracle answers that two distinct nations are in her womb, and neither will die—they will separate from within you (25:22–23).
At birth Sforno reads the names typologically: Esav (“made”) emerges first and hair-covered; Yaakov (“at the heel”) is named by God, hinting to Israel’s endurance when other nations perish (25:24–26; Jer. 46:28). Their youth diverges: Esav is an “ish sadeh,” a skilled agrarian; Yaakov a “yoshev ohalim,” split between the shepherd’s tent and the sacred tent—Jerusalem’s idealized dwelling—where one contemplates and sanctifies the Divine (25:27). Yitzchak loves even Esav, though knowing his incompleteness; Rivkah loves Yaakov alone, discerning Esav’s wickedness (25:28).
The sale of the birthright confirms fitness for service. Esav, so absorbed in his trade that he calls the stew only by its color (“that red”), discloses his unfitness for firstborn duties (25:30–31). Yaakov completes a formal acquisition—oath in place of physical kinyan, with chalipin via the vessel (25:33–34). Esav despises the birthright even afterward, proving there was no fraud.
In famine Yitzchak seeks Philistia with deference to Avimelech (26:1–2). God commands him to remain in the Land, promising wealth in-place—initially for Avraham’s sake until Yitzchak himself builds an altar and proclaims the Name, after which blessing attaches to him directly (26:3–5, 24–25). His hundredfold yield is both providence and the fruit of measured tithing, a channel for material blessing (26:12). Provincial jealousy closes wells until, with renewed public avodat Hashem, a well is dug without strife and Avimelech arrives humbled to covenant (26:15–29, 33).
Sforno reads Yitzchak’s dimmed sight as moral consequence—akin to Eli—for failing to rebuke Esav and to prevent unsuitable marriages (26:34–35; 27:1). Yitzchak asks Esav for delicacies to supply merit to a son otherwise unworthy; by contrast, when blessing Yaakov knowingly, he asks for nothing and blesses immediately (27:4; 28:3). The senses are read instrumentally: touch is accommodated by prepared skins; fragrance expands the soul’s delight, disposing the spirit to bless (27:22–27).
The first blessing grants Yaakov dew, grain, wine, and dominion—even over nations that do not serve him directly (27:28–29). Sforno notes Yitzchak (thinking he addressed Esav) intended a world where Yaakov holds Eretz Yisrael yet bears some political subordination, so his descendants not be consumed by worldly ambitions. On realizing providence, Yitzchak affirms “gam baruch yihyeh”—the blessing has adhered to the right recipient (27:33). Esav receives fat places of the earth, life by the sword, and conditional loosening of Israel’s yoke—but never true freedom from subservience (27:39–40).
Finally, Yitzchak intentionally grants Yaakov El Shaddai’s blessing—wealth, offspring, stature—and explicitly “the blessing of Avraham,” linking spiritual mission (teaching monotheism) with inheritance of the Land for children who perpetuate that mission (28:3–4). Esav’s belated marriage to Yishmael’s daughter exposes his superficial repentance and underscores Yitzchak’s earlier failure to restrain him (28:6–8).
Across the parasha, Sforno weaves a theology of worthy lineage, prayerful agency, public sanctification, and measured material success: covenantal continuity is secured when the righteous sanctify God’s Name in the Land, order their households, and bind blessing to disciplined deed.
📖 Source
R' Don Yitzchak Abarbanel approaches Toldot with characteristic depth, seeking to uncover not only the moral and theological currents within the lives of Yitzchak, Rivkah, Yaakov, and Esav, but also the divine strategy that guides the covenantal destiny. He begins with the conviction that the narratives of Toldot are not mere family stories but foundational moments in the unfolding of the Abrahamic promise.
Abarbanel opens by asking why the Torah details Rivkah’s barrenness and the extraordinary conception of the twins. He answers that these details demonstrate that the covenantal line proceeds through divine providence, not natural succession. Yitzchak’s prayer for Rivkah parallels Avraham’s intercessions, showing continuity in faith but distinct personality: Yitzchak acts with quiet submission rather than bold advocacy.
The tumult in Rivkah’s womb symbolizes the perpetual struggle between two spiritual worldviews — the contemplative and moral (Yaakov), and the instinctual and forceful (Esav). When the oracle declares “וְרַב יַעֲבֹד צָעִיר,” Abarbanel reads it as the theological hinge of Jewish history: though Esav will appear first in power, Yaakov’s spiritual legacy will ultimately define humanity’s path to divine service.
Abarbanel next questions the reason the Torah revisits a famine like that of Avraham’s time. The distinction “besides the first famine that was in the days of Avraham” teaches that God withheld famine during Avraham’s lifetime in his merit; only after his death did such hardship return, revealing that divine blessing had accompanied him throughout.
He also asks why Yitzchak is forbidden to go down to Egypt. The answer lies in Yitzchak’s unique sanctity — he was an olah temimah, wholly consecrated to God, and therefore not to leave the sacred boundaries of the land. God reassures him that the Abrahamic covenant will be confirmed through him and his seed, a promise rooted not in his own merit but “because Avraham obeyed My voice.”
Yitzchak’s actions in Gerar — his cautious deception about Rivkah, his agricultural success, and the re-digging of his father’s wells — are not trivial episodes but manifestations of divine favor. Abarbanel refutes Ramban’s view that these stories lack grandeur; for him, they reveal Yitzchak’s quiet strength. Each well represents the persistence of the covenant amid opposition: contention (Esek), hostility (Sitnah), and finally expansion (Rechovot). The peace treaty with Avimelech fulfills God’s word, “Do not fear, for I am with you,” and establishes Yitzchak as a moral and political heir to Avraham’s authority in the land.
Turning to the drama of Yaakov and Esav, Abarbanel poses a series of searching questions: Why does Yitzchak desire to bless Esav, a man of violent impulse? Why does he tie his blessing to a meal of hunted meat? How could Rivkah justify her deception? And why would divine providence allow a blessing given in error?
He explains that birkat ha-avot was not ordinary parental affection but the formal transmission of the covenant — a human act confirming God’s election. Since the Holy One had not yet disclosed which son was chosen, Yitzchak felt obliged to discern it through his own understanding. He favored Esav, viewing him as the natural firstborn and potential leader of a household that might yet be guided toward holiness. Rivkah, however, knew through prophecy that the spiritual mission belonged to Yaakov.
Yitzchak’s request for food served both a practical and mystical purpose: a moment of simchah and physical vitality enhances prophetic clarity. By fulfilling a command of honor and service, Esav would perhaps merit the spiritual flow Yitzchak sought to draw down upon his heir. Rivkah, aware that holiness could not rest on Esav’s unrestrained nature, orchestrated Yaakov’s substitution so that the blessing would alight where divine truth intended.
Abarbanel notes that Yitzchak’s senses of hearing, touch, and smell all play symbolic roles. The confusion between kol Yaakov and yedei Esav dramatizes the human tension between spiritual voice and material might. When Yitzchak ultimately declares, “גם ברוך יהיה,” he affirms that Providence has directed his words: once the blessing issued from his mouth, the divine influx had already descended and could not be revoked.
Abarbanel distinguishes three kinds of blessing: divine bestowal, human praise, and intercessory prayer. The patriarchal blessing partakes of the last — a supplication that God’s influence rest upon a prepared recipient. The act of the father does not create the blessing but channels it, like a conduit drawing light through a window. Once the flow descends, it cannot be withdrawn.
Thus, when Esav enters and cries for his own blessing, Yitzchak trembles — not from anger but from awe — realizing that Heaven itself had guided his lips. “Who was it, then, who hunted and brought me game?” he wonders, sensing that he has unknowingly enacted a divine decree. The blessings’ material form — “the dew of heaven, the fatness of the earth, and plenty of grain and wine” — mirror spiritual realities: divine grace, covenantal inheritance, and prosperity in service. Esav’s later portion, “by your sword shall you live,” represents temporal power detached from sacred mission.
Abarbanel views the deception not as moral corruption but as the unfolding of God’s hidden wisdom. Just as human intention may err while divine plan prevails, so too Yitzchak’s blindness symbolizes prophetic concealment: the eyes of the righteous may dim so that providence can act unimpeded. Rivkah’s courage preserves the covenantal line, ensuring that Yaakov — the man of tents, the student of Torah — becomes Israel, bearer of Abraham’s blessing.
Esav’s ensuing hatred inaugurates the historical struggle between Israel and Edom, between sanctified restraint and unbridled might. Yet even here, Abarbanel discerns divine design: Esav’s descendants will one day serve as instruments of discipline, chastening Israel when it strays, until ultimate redemption restores harmony.
For Abarbanel, Toldot is a meditation on inheritance — of land, faith, and destiny. Yitzchak embodies continuity through steadfastness; Rivkah, inspired insight; Yaakov, the triumph of spirit over impulse. Beneath the surface of domestic rivalry lies the architecture of divine providence, guiding history toward covenantal purpose.
Parashat Toldot thus reveals that divine blessing, though spoken by human lips, flows only toward the vessel prepared to receive it — and in that mystery, the fate of nations is decided.
📖 Sources
Across his many discourses on Parashat Toldot, Rabbi Avigdor Miller zt”l presents a unified theology of Providence, moral formation, and perception. Toldot, he explains, is not only the generational narrative of Yitzchak and Rivkah; it is a spiritual curriculum in which Hashem educates humanity about prayer, gratitude, and discernment amid deception. The Avos’ experiences—infertility, prayer, mistaken judgment, and moral testing—are paradigms for achieving yir’at Shamayim and true awareness of Hashem in an opaque world.
Yitzchak and Rivkah’s twenty-year struggle for children (Bereishit 25:21) becomes, in Rabbi Miller’s reading, the classical example of Divine pedagogy. Citing Yevamot 64a—that “HaKadosh Baruch Hu desires the prayers of the righteous”—he insists that unanswered prayer is not divine indifference but deliberate design.
Through persistent supplication, the soul refines its daʿat Elokim—the inner sense of standing lifnei Hashem.
Miller contrasts “lip-service prayer” with va-yeʿetar, a davening of existential intensity: one that bangs against the walls of reality until awareness breaks through. Hashem “squeezes” His servants precisely to elicit that consciousness. The purpose of life, therefore, is not comfort or longevity but to attain the experiential cognition of God’s Presence. Every frustration—childlessness, illness, financial anxiety—becomes an invitation to live more consciously before the Creator.
“The purpose of life is not to continue to exist,” he writes; “it is to achieve reishit daʿat—the awareness of Hashem born in moments of need.” 📖 (Toldos 5784)
Rabbi Miller broadens the lesson of prayer to the entire rhythm of existence. Even in abundance, man remains utterly dependent. His father’s explanation of b’ra’av zantanu u’v’sova kilkaltanu (“You fed us in famine and sustained us in plenty”) captures the paradox: material prosperity is itself a disguised famine if not recognized as Divine gift.
The “healthy” person must pray for health; the “wealthy” must beg for sustenance. Every heartbeat, every breath, every rational thought is a miracle of ongoing creation. This continuous dependence, properly understood, abolishes the secular illusion of autonomy and restores the Jew’s natural posture of thanksgiving.
Thus the pasuk “Somech Hashem le-chol ha-noflim” (Ps. 145:14) is read in two lights:
To live with such double awareness is, for Miller, the hallmark of true emunah chushit, a sensory faith.
In “Seeing in the Darkness” (Toldos 5785), Rabbi Miller re-examines Yitzchak’s apparent misjudgment of Eisav. Far from naïve, Yitzchak is depicted as razor-sharp, a prophet-philosopher whose very greatness made him susceptible to divine misdirection. Hashem “arranged” the deception so that even a man of the keenest perception would err—teaching future generations humility before appearances.
Rivkah’s insight, granted through prophecy (“ve-Rav yaʿavod tzaʿir”), and her silence, demonstrate that revelation obligates restraint. Yitzchak’s trembling upon discovery (27:33) embodies the Torah’s cautionary truth: human discernment, even sanctified, can be clouded by providential darkness.
The moral: if Yitzchak can be deceived, none are immune. Every generation must learn to distinguish the Yaakov-forces that appear modest and frail from the Eisav-forces that appear vigorous and successful.
Drawing on Tehillim 104—“Tashit choshech vayehi layla bo tirmos kol chayat yaʿar”—Miller interprets Olam HaZeh itself as the “night” of moral perception. The beasts that prowl are not literal predators but cultural elites: atheistic academics, moral relativists, and ideologues who corrode spiritual clarity while cloaked in refinement.
In his homiletic anthropology, the modern professor, the amoral psychologist, and the secular physician are the heirs of Eisav—“men of the field” adorned in garments of culture yet estranged from God. They are chayot yaʿar b’levush adam—beasts in human dress.
The task of Israel, and particularly of the student of Torah, is to acquire night-vision: to see through the polish of civilization and recognize spiritual truth. Tashit choshech thus becomes a divine test—Hashem “makes darkness” so that human beings may merit to pierce it.
If the darkness hides Eisav’s evil, it also conceals Yaakov’s holiness. Rabbi Miller contends that modern Jews, dazzled by worldly success, undervalue Torah learners. He cites Sanhedrin 99b: one who asks, “Mah ahanu lan Rabbanan?”—“What benefit do we gain from the sages?”—is deemed an apikoros.
For Miller, the talmidei chachamim are not merely personal seekers but the very infrastructure of Israel’s survival: “Reish Lakish said, ‘The scholars do not need guarding; they guard the city.’” (Bava Batra 7b).
To “see in the darkness” is to recognize that every kol Torah sustains the world more effectively than armies or fortifications. The scholar’s beit midrash is the nation’s true defense ministry. This inversion of value—seeing holiness where the world sees obscurity—is the ultimate triumph of Yaakov over Eisav.
Rabbi Miller insists that moral perception must be trained, not assumed. Just as physical smell can be refined, so too the soul’s “olfactory” sense. The Gemara’s vision—“Atidin bachurei Yisrael she-yitnu rei’ach tov kelvanon”—becomes a directive for practice: when one passes a yeshivah, he should feel its fragrance.
This exercise of conscious admiration—thanking Hashem for Torah learners, perceiving their beauty and nobility—gradually reshapes cognition. Such habituated perception is the antidote to cultural blindness. By praising the unseen good, one acquires the inner eyes of Rivkah, not the dazzled gaze of Yitzchak before his awakening.
Across all seven essays, Miller converges on a single existential discipline:
In this way, Toldot becomes a mirror for spiritual evolution: from the yearning of Yitzchak’s barren prayers, through the moral confusion of Eisav’s deception, to the clarified daʿat Elokim of Israel—the one who “strives with God and prevails.”
Rabbi Avigdor Miller reads Parashat Toldot as a theology of refinement through paradox. Divine delay cultivates faith; abundance conceals dependence; darkness becomes revelation. The Avos’ experiences are not distant myths but pedagogical prototypes teaching how to live “aware in the night.”
Ultimately, to be a child of Yitzchak and Rivkah is to live in continuous tefillah, continuous gratitude, and continuous discrimination between the fleeting glow of Eisav and the enduring light of Yaakov. In Miller’s formulation, holiness is not discovered—it is perceived, by those who learn to see in the darkness.
Dive into mitzvot, prayer, and Torah study—each section curated to help you learn, reflect, and live with intention. New insights are added regularly, creating an evolving space for spiritual growth.
Explore the 613 mitzvot and uncover the meaning behind each one. Discover practical ways to integrate them into your daily life with insights, sources, and guided reflection.
Learn the structure, depth, and spiritual intent behind Jewish prayer. Dive into morning blessings, Shema, Amidah, and more—with tools to enrich your daily connection.
Each week’s parsha offers timeless wisdom and modern relevance. Explore summaries, key themes, and mitzvah connections to deepen your understanding of the Torah cycle.
